<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<judgement id="154010000003027_VI_Gz_000084_2016_Uz_2016-05-10_001">
   <signature>VI Gz 84/16</signature>
   <date>2016-05-10 02:00:00.0 CEST</date>
   <publicationDate>2016-05-31 19:15:27.0 CEST</publicationDate>
   <courtId>15401000</courtId>
   <departmentId>3027</departmentId>
   <type>DECISION, REASON</type>
   <chairman>Anna Harmata</chairman>
   <judges>
      <judge>Anna Harmata</judge>
   </judges>
   <themePhrases/>
   <references>
      <reference>Ustawa z dnia 17 listopada 1964 r. - Kodeks postępowania cywilnego (Dz. U. z 1964 r. Nr 43, poz. 296 - art. 133; art. 133 zd. 1; art. 133 § 3; art. 370; art. 385; art. 397; art. 397 § 2; art. 505(10); art. 505(10) § 1)</reference>
   </references>
   <legalBases>
      <legalBasis>art. 370 kpc w zw, z art. 397 § 3 kpc</legalBasis>
   </legalBases>
   <recorder>asystent sędziego Agnieszka Wasilewska - Kardyś</recorder>
   <decision></decision>
   <reviser>Magdalena Kamuda</reviser>
   <publisher>Barbara Dziopak</publisher>
   <dateOfPublication>2016-05-31 19:15:27.0 CEST</dateOfPublication>
   <dateOfLastUpdate>2017-03-01 16:24:36.0 CET</dateOfLastUpdate>
</judgement>