<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<judgement id="154505250001003_II_C_002195_2014_Uz_2015-05-26_001">
   <signature>II C 2195/14</signature>
   <date>2015-05-26 02:00:00.0 CEST</date>
   <publicationDate>2015-08-03 20:15:09.0 CEST</publicationDate>
   <courtId>15450525</courtId>
   <departmentId>1003</departmentId>
   <type>SENTENCE</type>
   <chairman>Kamila Paluszkiewicz</chairman>
   <judges>
      <judge>Kamila Paluszkiewicz</judge>
   </judges>
   <themePhrases>
      <themePhrase>Użytkowanie Wieczyste</themePhrase>
   </themePhrases>
   <references/>
   <legalBases>
      <legalBasis>art. 77 ugn</legalBasis>
   </legalBases>
   <recorder>apl. adw. Jakub Nawrocki</recorder>
   <thesis>Wypowiedzenie opłaty rocznej powinno nastąpić w stosunku do całej nieruchomości.</thesis>
   <decision></decision>
   <reviser>Iwona Borsów</reviser>
   <publisher>Iwona Borsów</publisher>
   <dateOfPublication>2015-08-03 20:15:09.0 CEST</dateOfPublication>
   <dateOfLastUpdate>2016-02-15 03:36:57.0 CET</dateOfLastUpdate>
</judgement>