<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<judgement id="155515300001003_II_C_001070_2016_Uz_2017-07-26_002">
   <signature>II C 1070/16</signature>
   <date>2017-07-26 02:00:00.0 CEST</date>
   <publicationDate>2017-08-29 22:03:49.0 CEST</publicationDate>
   <courtId>15551530</courtId>
   <departmentId>1003</departmentId>
   <type>DECISION</type>
   <chairman>Justyna Pikulik</chairman>
   <judges>
      <judge>Justyna Pikulik</judge>
   </judges>
   <themePhrases/>
   <references>
      <reference>Ustawa z dnia 17 listopada 1964 r. - Kodeks postępowania cywilnego (Dz. U. z 1964 r. Nr 43, poz. 296 - art. 101; art. 102; art. 203; art. 203 § 1; art. 203 § 2; art. 203 § 4; art. 355; art. 355 § 1; art. 355 § 2; art. 98; art. 98 § 1; § 4)</reference>
   </references>
   <legalBases/>
   <recorder>praktykant Adam Bąk</recorder>
   <decision></decision>
   <reviser>Izabela Haptar-Sylmanowicz</reviser>
   <publisher>Izabela Haptar-Sylmanowicz</publisher>
   <dateOfPublication>2017-08-29 22:03:49.0 CEST</dateOfPublication>
   <dateOfLastUpdate>2017-09-28 09:28:28.0 CEST</dateOfLastUpdate>
</judgement>